DAD "No ban on bottled drinks" VS LAWSAN " He ban the bottled drinks for our safety with approval from SRC" - who is lying?

This is getting interesting by the day, trust us as we would never hesitate to bring pure, factual and well investigated information to you.

The simple truth is that change is hard for everybody and even harder to accept, the Unionism atmosphere in RSUST has never had a media outlet to scrutinize their activities, so the coming of Gistmeust has become their nemesis.... the only way to fight back is to insist that we are witch-hunting or going into MILLITANTIC JOURNALISM (as was used by the Grammatical professor in the cabinet  aka Professor John-bull as i like to call him, funny enough checked my dictionary no word like that LOLX).

But truth be told in struggling to save face even more blunders are falling out of their closets. As it were, it gave me  a good five seconds laugh when i saw this post on the FB page of the Executive President SUG aka GCAFof RSUST see below:

The question on your mind now would be what is funny well on this post it is categorically stated, quote:

"there is no ban on pure water and bottled coke in school"

 The funny part is that on an interview with the LAWSAN President Elect  who is to be inaugurated on Monday 14th November, anchored by Gistmeust reporters on the 10th of November, the President without mixing words while addressing a question on the relevance on the ban of bottled coke in this era of economic turbulence within the country stated that information he got when he realized that an order for the ban of bottled drinks was given by the president was that the decision was born out of the SUG Presidents concern for the life's of the students. Quote:

I was informed that the ban was suggested by the CSO after a clash by rival cult groups on campus in which empty bottles from vendors close to the scene were used as weapons, in fact they were throwing the bottles at each other. At this suggestion the SUG President sponsored a bill to the SRC, which are representatives from your faculties and mine too and they accepted the ban, so i think the President did what he thought was best. 

When asked if that was the best solution, he said NO considering the fact that the students were not Pre-informed of the impending ban.His first thought was to beef up security on campus which maybe may not be very quick in implementation but he would have preferred reasonable Pre-information before that decision was taken as an average RSUST student.

Various students have confirmed that they were refused bottled drinks when they requested for it from vendors see this comment by some students on the post by our presidoo

would it be wrong to say to all fanatics of this government that will not open their eyes and see beyond their sentiments and understand that their sentiment is also their jailer because a man that accepts paying #40 transit fair, #50 for pen, #20 for 1 photocopy of engineering timetable to innocent year 1, 80 leaves for #120, and NOW instead of #100 for coke and four biscuits its #100 for just one plastic bottle because of ban in this recession, on a campus that is suppose to be for students and not workers is in a mental prison if he knows that these things are cheaper outside campus and still accept it. Kindly comment your take below

Thank God for this, GISTMEUST.COM is finally vindicated and of causes we remain un-deterred in ensuring that we keep the average  RSUST student factually informed......